From 193bd50d2bf8e840d15525353f2a6c5405926cfe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfgang Mueller Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 22:55:22 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Automatic bot messages are proposals if disruptive. --- lawguide.tex | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/lawguide.tex b/lawguide.tex index 83ef284..3a2e623 100644 --- a/lawguide.tex +++ b/lawguide.tex @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ Same as without the \texttt{nick: } prefix, but instead refer to the relevant pr \item Filibustering messages \emph{are} proposals, \emph{unless} they're sent by bots to explain something in the previous message (e.g. title bot, automatic translation) \emph{or} they begin with \texttt{nolog:} or \texttt{[nolog]}. \item Bot messages sent as a response to direct command (e.g. program evaluation, non-automatic translation) \emph{are} proposals. +\item Bot messages that are generally to be ignored in the legislative process (e.g. title bot, automatic translation) \emph{are} proposals \emph{if} intended to disrupt. \item Notices are treated like messages (except they can't be used to vote). \item Nick changes \emph{are not} proposals, \emph{unless} they are a direct response to something in channel \emph{or} are disruptive. \item Kicks and mode changes \emph{are} proposals.