Compare commits

..

No commits in common. "08c8d33b20d7fcbb31e27edbbb002d1d2c91fdc5" and "96f9b11cf2f355d163dcf43d5135219008dfb5c4" have entirely different histories.

3 changed files with 59 additions and 75 deletions

2
.gitignore vendored
View File

@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
puer
*.o

View File

@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
DESTDIR ?=
PREFIX ?= /usr/local
EXEC_PREFIX ?= $(PREFIX)
BINDIR ?= $(EXEC_PREFIX)/bin
CFLAGS ?= -std=gnu11 -Os -g -Wall -Wextra -Werror -pedantic
.SUFFIXES:
.SUFFIXES: .c .o
all: puer.o
puer: puer.o
$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $<
.c.o:
$(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) -o $@ $<
clean:
rm -f puer *.o
distclean: clean
.PHONY: all clean distclean
.DEFAULT: all

107
puer.c
View File

@ -25,18 +25,16 @@ void xxtea128(uint32_t const key[4], uint32_t block[4]) {
// key accesses, since key is only 4 words long
//
// 3. Go through each word in the block and derive its new
// value based on its current value (v[p]), the next (y)
// and the previous word (z), wrapping around the ends
// of the block as needed.
// value based on next (y) and previous word (z),
// wrapping around as needed, as well as the round
// constant(s) and the key.
//
// The function for deriving the new value of a word is a
// xor of sums of xors, followed by an in-place addition.
// The first sum adds together combinations of the next and
// previous word, and the second sum adds together
// previous/next combined with a value dependant on the
// round constant. The key is also mixed into the word in
// the first xor of second sum. After this the result is
// added back into the original word.
// The function for deriving the new value of a block is a
// xor of sums of xors. The first sum adds together
// combinations of the next and previous block, and the
// second sum adds together previous/bext combined with a
// value dependant on the round constant. The key is also
// mixed into the block in the first xor of second sum.
//
// I have changed the operand order in the second xor of
// first add and in the second add. This is to keep the
@ -58,12 +56,32 @@ uint32_t bytes2word(unsigned char const bytes[4]) {
}
void word2bytes(unsigned char *bytes, uint32_t word) {
bytes[0] = word;
bytes[1] = word>>8;
bytes[2] = word>>16;
bytes[0] = word & 0xff;
bytes[1] = word>>8 & 0xff;
bytes[2] = word>>16 & 0xff;
bytes[3] = word>>24;
}
void derive_subkey(uint32_t key[4], uint32_t nonce[6], uint32_t subkey[4]) {
// We are using an extended nonce construction with 192 bit nonces.
// The first 128 bits of nonce are encrypted using xxtea128 with
// the provided key, in order to derive a subkey that is then used
// alongside the remaining nonce to do the actual encryption.
//
// This is, as far as I can tell, not a standard construction. I
// have based it on xchacha20, with the understanding that it
// should not matter if the function used to derive the subkey is
// reversible or not, since an attacker doesn't know the original
// key and the original key is used only in this derivation.
subkey[0] = nonce[0];
subkey[1] = nonce[1];
subkey[2] = nonce[2];
subkey[3] = nonce[3];
xxtea128(key, subkey);
}
struct hashstate {
// A_n and B_n of the MDC-2 algorithm
uint32_t a[4];
@ -112,36 +130,36 @@ void compress_hash(struct hashstate *state) {
message[2] = bytes2word(&state->buffer[8]);
message[3] = bytes2word(&state->buffer[12]);
// A_i, B_i
uint32_t a[4], b[4];
memcpy(a, state->a, sizeof(a));
memcpy(b, state->b, sizeof(b));
// V_i = M_i ^ E(M_i, A_i)
// Note: In this description A_i is the *key*, not the plaintext
uint32_t v[4];
memcpy(v, message, sizeof(v));
xxtea128(state->a, v);
v[0] ^= message[0];
v[1] ^= message[1];
v[2] ^= message[2];
v[3] ^= message[3];
xxtea128(message, a);
a[0] ^= message[0];
a[1] ^= message[1];
a[2] ^= message[2];
a[3] ^= message[3];
// W_i = M_i ^ E(M_i, B_i);
uint32_t w[4];
memcpy(w, message, sizeof(w));
xxtea128(state->b, w);
w[0] ^= message[0];
w[1] ^= message[1];
w[2] ^= message[2];
w[3] ^= message[3];
xxtea128(message, b);
b[0] ^= message[0];
b[1] ^= message[1];
b[2] ^= message[2];
b[3] ^= message[3];
// A_{i+1} = Vwi^L || W_i^R
state->a[0] = v[0];
state->a[1] = v[1];
state->a[2] = w[2];
state->a[3] = w[3];
// A_{i+1} = V_i^L || W_i^R
state->a[0] = a[0];
state->a[1] = a[1];
state->a[2] = b[2];
state->a[3] = b[3];
// B_{i+1} = W_i^L || V_i^R
state->b[0] = v[0];
state->b[1] = v[1];
state->b[2] = w[2];
state->b[3] = w[3];
state->b[0] = b[0];
state->b[1] = b[1];
state->b[2] = a[2];
state->b[3] = a[3];
// Mark that we have consumed the buffer
state->length = 0;
@ -151,7 +169,7 @@ void feed_hash(struct hashstate *state, unsigned char input[], size_t length) {
// Invariant: The buffer will be filled somewhere between 0 and 15
// when we enter this loop. This is because once it reaches 16, the
// hash compression function is executed.
for (size_t i = 0; i < length; i++) {
for (size_t i; i < length; i++) {
// Must not overflow the internat counter. In practice we will not
// hit this.
assert(state->totalbits <= UINT64_MAX - 8);
@ -182,15 +200,8 @@ void finalize_hash(struct hashstate *state, unsigned char hash[32]) {
}
// Add the number of bits, and do one last compression
state->buffer[8] = state->totalbits >> 56;
state->buffer[9] = state->totalbits >> 48;
state->buffer[10] = state->totalbits >> 40;
state->buffer[11] = state->totalbits >> 32;
state->buffer[12] = state->totalbits >> 24;
state->buffer[13] = state->totalbits >> 16;
state->buffer[14] = state->totalbits >> 8;
state->buffer[15] = state->totalbits;
state->length += 8;
word2bytes(&state->buffer[state->length+=4], state->totalbits>>32);
word2bytes(&state->buffer[state->length+=4], state->totalbits & 0xffffffffUL);
compress_hash(state);
// Extract the hash state