\documentclass[11pt]{article} \usepackage{fullpage} \usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx} \usepackage{setspace} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{hyperref} \renewcommand{\thesection}{} \renewcommand{\thesubsection}{\arabic{subsection}} \makeatletter \def\@seccntformat#1{\csname #1ignore\expandafter\endcsname\csname the#1\endcsname\quad} \let\sectionignore\@gobbletwo \let\latex@numberline\numberline \def\numberline#1{\if\relax#1\relax\else\latex@numberline{#1}\fi} \makeatother \begin{document} \section{\#osdev-offtopic law guide} This document is merely a summary of the most important laws helpful for everyday activity. \subsection{Terminology} \begin{itemize} \item \texttt{law}: A passed proposal. A proposal requires three contiguous votes by unique non-bot members of the channel to be passed. Laws need not effect active behavior on the channel, and can be passed because of Rule of Funny. \item \texttt{malcompliance}: The act of complying in the worst possible manner. Or, as the Finnish define it, ``following the letter of the law while pissing on the spirit''. Examples: \begin{quote} ``Hey could you test sortix?'' ``test -f sortix.iso \# Yep. It's a file.'' \\ ``Hey, can you give me some water?'' ``You mean aqua?'' ``...sure.'' *gives aqua fortis* \end{quote} \item \texttt{filibuster}: Anything that is sent on the channel, and can stop a law from being passed, is known as a filibuster. This is line in with the literal meaning, ``obstructs progress in a legislative assembly''. \item \texttt{proposal}: Anything that can filibuster can be a proposal. \item \texttt{new ancient law}: A law that has always been true, but was only recently discovered and legislated. \item \texttt{lawrememberer}: The person responsible for maintaining the lawlist, currently `nortti'. \item \texttt{lawspeaker}: The person who interprets and clarifies the law, currently `nortti'. \item \texttt{triminority}: The three required to pass a law. Can be used to refer to an actual group, or a hypothetical group. \item \texttt{triumvirate}: People who are more active with channel work, and have additional rights with ChanServ. Currently consists of `FireFly', `heddwch', `meowrobot', `nortti', `puckipedia', `shikhin', `sortie', `vehk', and `ybden'. \item \texttt{vote}: Anything described under `Voting.Syntaxen'. \end{itemize} \subsection{Voting} \subsubsection{Basics} At every moment, there is an active proposal and a vote count. If a vote that doesn't refer to the current active proposal is cast, the active proposal changes to the new proposal, and the vote count resets to 0. A filibuster sets the active proposal to itself and resets the vote count to 0. A vote increments the vote count by 1 after change of proposal (if required). When the vote count reaches 3, the active proposal becomes a law. \subsubsection{Syntaxen} There are several different kinds of syntaxes for voting on laws. They're all based on the original syntax of \texttt{:D}, with various modifications. \begin{itemize} \item \texttt{:D} The most basic form. Votes for the current active proposal. \item \texttt{:D\~{}N} Votes N proposals back. Is 0-indexed, so \texttt{:D\~{}0} is equivalent to \texttt{:D}. \item \texttt{:D\^{} :D\^{}\^{} :D\^{}\^{}\^{} ...} Equivalent to \texttt{:D\~{}N}, where N is the number of `\^{}'s. \item \texttt{:D\~{}mathematical expression} If the mathematical expression, or its modulus, is a non-negative integer, say N, then it is equivalent to \texttt{:D\~{}N}. Otherwise, it is an invalid vote. \item \texttt{:D\~{}kick} Refers to last kick. Can only be used right after a kick, or a kick followed by a join by the kicked person. \item \texttt{nick: :D, nick: :D\~{}N, nick: :D\^{}, nick: :D\~{}mathematical expression} Same as without the \texttt{nick: } prefix, but instead refer to the relevant proposal made by `nick'. \texttt{nick, } can be used instead of \texttt{nick: }. \end{itemize} \subsubsection{What counts as a filibuster/proposal?} \begin{itemize} \item Filibustering messages \emph{are} proposals, \emph{unless} they're sent by bots to explain something in the previous message (e.g. title bot, automatic translation) \emph{or} they begin with \texttt{nolog:} or \texttt{[nolog]}. \item Bot messages sent as a response to direct command (e.g. program evaluation, non-automatic translation) \emph{are} proposals. \item Bot messages that are generally to be ignored in the legislative process (e.g. title bot, automatic translation) \emph{are} proposals \emph{if} intended to disrupt. \item Notices are treated like messages (except they can't be used to vote). \item Nick changes \emph{are not} proposals, \emph{unless} they are a direct response to something in channel \emph{or} are disruptive. \item Kicks and mode changes \emph{are} proposals. \item Joins \emph{are not} proposals, \emph{unless} it is a first join \emph{or} intended to disrupt. \item Parts and quits \emph{are not} proposals, \emph{unless} intended to disrupt. \item Special behaviour: valid votes with \texttt{:D:} or \texttt{D:} substituted for \texttt{:D} can \emph{not} act as proposals. These messages still filibuster. \end{itemize} \subsection{Behaving} \begin{itemize} \item \url{https://gitlab.com/sortie/mmmm/blob/master/mmmm.txt} (MMMM). A collection of rules and guidelines that evolved from horrors that won't be mentioned here; currently in helpful form. By new ancient law, MMMM is lawful. \item Mark NSFW content. Linked NSFW content should be marked, preferably with \texttt{NSFW} or \texttt{[NSFW]}. \item Do not kick idlers. Idlers are defined as people whose last activity has been 5 minutes ago (where activity implies messages or nick changes as a response to something in the channel), or who have marked themselves away (e.g. by \texttt{bbl}). \item Avoid funkicking. `Funkicking' is where you kick someone just for fun, or for some insignificant reason. Exception to this is if the person you're `funkicking' does not mind the fun kick. \end{itemize} \subsection{Additional stuff} \begin{itemize} \item In cases where there is disagreement on whether something passed, the lawrememberer's point of view is used. \item The person who opens the vote on a proposal MUST provide the law to lawrememberer, if requested to do so. \item Zero-width spaces in votes are to be ignored. \item It is a good custom to vote on one's own proposal last. \end{itemize} \end{document}