Cette révision appartient à :
Juhani Krekelä 2018-09-08 21:31:05 +03:00
Parent 8e2c595a35
révision 8bc6e41043
2 fichiers modifiés avec 11 ajouts et 6 suppressions

Voir le fichier

@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ TODO
* `sshwot-scan-known-hosts`
* Investigate why it says sshwot-file is required in `sshwot-filter`
Contributors
------------
* Wolfgang Müller (vehk) helped with mdoc and proofread the man page for
`sshwot-verify`
License
-------

Voir le fichier

@ -52,12 +52,12 @@ The reason why the
.Li [same fingerprint]
.Dc
message is not printed if there is a full match in the same file is twofold.
Firstly, there are only two cases where the information is useful. One is if
some other host is impersonating the host you are trying to reach, and other is
if the host has several different domains and you are trying to verify one that
is not in the sshwot files. Neither applies in the case there is a full match
for the host and the fingerprint. Secondly, it is quite common to have several
domains resolving into one host in the same sshwot file. If the
Firstly, there are only two cases where this kind of information is useful. One
is if some other host is impersonating the host you are trying to reach, and
other is if the host has several different domains and you are trying to verify
one that is not in the sshwot files. Neither applies in the case where there is
a full match for the host and the fingerprint. Secondly, it is quite common to
have several domains resolving to one host in the same sshwot file. If the
.Do
.Li [same fingerprint]
.Dc