diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index cd2a282..158cebf 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ TODO
 * `sshwot-scan-known-hosts`
 * Investigate why it says sshwot-file is required in `sshwot-filter`
 
+Contributors
+------------
+* Wolfgang Müller (vehk) helped with mdoc and proofread the man page for
+  `sshwot-verify`
+
 License
 -------
 
diff --git a/sshwot-verify.1 b/sshwot-verify.1
index 79cfe17..f3ae1b3 100644
--- a/sshwot-verify.1
+++ b/sshwot-verify.1
@@ -52,12 +52,12 @@ The reason why the
 .Li [same fingerprint]
 .Dc
 message is not printed if there is a full match in the same file is twofold.
-Firstly, there are only two cases where the information is useful. One is if
-some other host is impersonating the host you are trying to reach, and other is
-if the host has several different domains and you are trying to verify one that
-is not in the sshwot files. Neither applies in the case there is a full match
-for the host and the fingerprint. Secondly, it is quite common to have several
-domains resolving into one host in the same sshwot file. If the
+Firstly, there are only two cases where this kind of information is useful. One
+is if some other host is impersonating the host you are trying to reach, and
+other is if the host has several different domains and you are trying to verify
+one that is not in the sshwot files. Neither applies in the case where there is
+a full match for the host and the fingerprint. Secondly, it is quite common to
+have several domains resolving to one host in the same sshwot file. If the
 .Do
 .Li [same fingerprint]
 .Dc